gettingstarted
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Survey: Did you do the REALbasic tutorial?

To: gettingstarted at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Subject: RE: Survey: Did you do the REALbasic tutorial?
From: Emile Schwarz <emile dot a dot schwarz at wanadoo dot fr>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:03:08 +0200
Delivered-to: gettingstarted at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <20040911170011 dot AC58E456FCD at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Hi,

I have to say that I readed carefully the first edition and then get an eye on the following [pdf and rb files].

> In fact the tutorial and user guide seems to have been recently updated
> (July for one, August for the other).  That would seem to be something to
> advertise (in the notification sense)!
I could not recall how long I am asking to put size of the file and creation (or modification) date in the two Download pages (was one when I first asked that).

With the time, I finally get the file size * [thus now people have an idea of how long it could take to download] but I am still waiting for a "Version #" or a "Release Date".

Even if I do not read all the downloaded pdf file, I do not like to [SPEND SO EXPENSIVE TIME TO] download twice the same pdf file.

I do that at each major REALbasic version (and sometimes, I get both versions: Mac+Win), but excepted in early July (my iBook crashed) where I have to download the documentations to read them on Windows, I never download them withing minor version life [because there is no date/version].

This is a first (at nearly no coast: 30/60 seconds for all the documentation files ?) step to improve.

Then, Joseph advice is fine:

a. add a link in the two Download pages to the "Reference Library" ("Information Center");

b. add a link in the two Download pages to the "Examples Libray" (I think at Jonathan nice examples page; but it can be expanded to some other examples)

c. refine all Language Reference examples (the ones that really do something, no the single lines that "show only the syntax") and put them in a "Language Reference Library" (using the same look and feel Jonathan gets in its examples page or similar) **

d. add a link to a page that have a list of links to web tutorials:
   a. Name of the Tutorial (name of the explained technology)
   b. A simple description paragraph that shows what the tutorial said
   c. The link to the web page
   d. Eventually: the name of the page owner
      (the owner may eventually ask this one)
   e. Eventually: the name of the development environment used in the Tutorial
      (so too newbie people knows that they will get some hard time
       understanding the tutorial before downloading it)

Nota:
-----

Some people already told about adding/expanding explanations on other subjects/technologies (Tutorials / HowTo) on other technologies (lacked in the current tutorial); that is good too.


The REALbasic Developer Magazine case:

Some people may be angry about having to pay for the informations given by the magazine. But we have to pay if we want Matt (RBTDG) book. So this is not a problem at all.

Of course, when the magazine explain in-depth a technology (say a three to ten pages article on a specific technology), IMHO there is nothing to rant against that, and the people who want to read the article have to buy the magazine.

_BUT_ a single tip published in the magazine (say three to ten lines of code) _have_ to be explained elsewhere too.

These lines are just some example of how I feel about the development environment and any third party; the same applies to the plugins vs native code _OR_ the provided MacOS (or Windows) documentation vs informations published in magazines. And naturally, the ratio between what REAL Software _have_ to provide (included in the tool price) and what other will provide (we have to pay for) may vary from person to person.

In an utopic world where people work for pleasure and get no money in return [everything is free], this discussion would have no sense. Our world is not like that; people have to get bucks for their bangs, and the question is about how many bangs can I get with my bucks (or how many bucks people are ready to give me for these bangs ;) ).

Cheers,

Emile


* This is for V92 - RTC users (no DSL connection).

** Back to the AppleSoft Basic time.
I had created two folders that I fill with all the examples I found in the paper documentation.
The first folder was for the introductory book given with the Apple //c;
The second folder was for the two AppleSoft BASIC Reference Manuals I brough later (when incidentally someone told me those beast exists !)

I also put there (a 800KB floppy disk) some screen shots (even when the paper display them).


-- ---------- Original mail:
gettingstarted-request at lists dot realsoftware dot com wrote:
Subject: RE: Survey: Did you do the REALbasic tutorial?
From: "Joseph Claeys" <joseph at claeys dot com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:00:11 -0500

In fact the tutorial and user guide seems to have been recently updated
(July for one, August for the other).  That would seem to be something to
advertise (in the notification sense)!  So now I'm wondering if the
educational curriculum is being updated?  It seems to me that many beginners
would benefit from working through those too (in fact all the learning tools
could be integrated then simply provide the "Teacher Edition" that focuses
on discussion and lab projects).
At the very least RS should consider putting all that stuff together on a
single page.  Perhaps calling it the "Learning Center", or "Knowledge
Center",  or other such title.  I too had a difficult time finding it...
Generally I consider "downloads" to be applications/tools or other such
items.


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>