realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Building for Windows

To: REALbasic Network Users Group <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Building for Windows
From: Enrico Rosso <enrico dot rosso at imageline dot it>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:41:37 +0200
we bought realBasic essentially because of his windows building capabilities and we have thousands of copies of some apps we wrote.

In my experience:
virtual PC gives realistic results with rb built apps, but you shouldn't trust too much socket behaviour (well, of course, if it works works well, if it doesn't maybe works on a real winbox).

for realbasic db all is working fine, but sometimes, on both macos and windows, rb breake the db while crashing. I think this issue is corrected on latest versions of rb, but having a sort of backup system is a smart thing to do.

realbasic db is handy for simple tasks, but maybe you should consider using faster and more reliable (and maybe more expensive too ;-) db engines for serious database driven applications.

what doesn't work really fine under windows is the UI refresh, more often on a SDI build. sometimes controls doesn't refresh well, and version 3 had some problems with canvas controls.

given that, programming for windows with a mac and realbasic is a great experience, controls and events behave correctly, timers and threads run smoothly.

for debuggin purposes I use 3 methods:

1. message boxes that says where the code execution is and report some data 2. Write a log file with [mytextoutputstream]=[folderitem].appendToTextFile (useful for some routines like record of file parsing if you write the values too)
3. use the "exception" keyword often


On Friday, July 12, 2002, at 04:03 PM, Sam DeVore wrote:

The things that  I am most concerned about are socket behavior and the
RealBASIC DB at this point, but even simple things like menus and ideas for debugging. I am a windows newbie. And also things like how realistic is it to think that I will be able to get realistic results testing on different flavors of virtual pc? Well I guess I will have to just track what I find
and answers that I get...

Sam D

On 7/11/02 10:30 PM, "REALbasic Network Users Group"
<realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> wrote:

AFAIK, there's no list out there that specifies the caveats of Win32 RB
apps.  What are you trying to accomplish?  What sort of models are you
thinking of implementing?  If you give a little more information on the
topic, we might be able to give you a little more information on what to
watch out for.

~Aaron

I was wondering if there is a faq or place with a list of things to consider when building RB apps for windows. I have just been faced with a need to build some existing apps for Windows and was interested in some "heads up"
and "gotchas"



---
Subscribe to the digest:
<mailto:realbasic-nug-digest at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:realbasic-nug-off at lists dot realsoftware dot com>


--
enrico dot rosso at imageline dot it



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>