on 20/03/03 17:10, "Ruslan Zasukhin" <sunshine at public dot kherson dot ua>
claimed
that:
> Although it is true that Valentina 2.0 will be re-written on 70-80%
> I do not think we can sale codebase of Valentina 1.x to anybody.
> Just because it contains algorithms.
too bad, *that* was a good idea...
> Scenario of Richard Altenburg, looks more realistic...
not at all, unless Valentina revise its licensing conditions. They currently
prevent me to use it in my product. Complying with these conditions would
cripple the product, while requiring my users to acquire a separate license
would increase the acquisition price too much.
Abstract from the "V4RB COMMERCIAL LICENSE.pdf" of Valentina:
> You agree that any application, product or device you create including any
> component of the Software, if it includes the ability to create, modify, save
> or store data, shall have only limited ability to modify fields within a
> database or its structure: any database application, product or device shall
> be limited by no less than 80% of its fields designated as containing
> specific, unmodifiable data types. In addition, any application, product, or
> device you create will not have the ability to alter database schema.
do RB users really want these limitations in their RB products (current and
future)?
---
A searchable archive of this list is available at:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/search.php>
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:realbasic-nug-off at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subscribe to the digest:
<mailto:realbasic-nug-digest at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
.
|