On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 12:09 PM, Hubert Garrido wrote:
on 20/03/03 17:10, "Ruslan Zasukhin" <sunshine at public dot kherson dot ua>
claimed
that:
Although it is true that Valentina 2.0 will be re-written on 70-80%
I do not think we can sale codebase of Valentina 1.x to anybody.
Just because it contains algorithms.
too bad, *that* was a good idea...
Scenario of Richard Altenburg, looks more realistic...
not at all, unless Valentina revise its licensing conditions. They
currently
prevent me to use it in my product. Complying with these conditions
would
cripple the product, while requiring my users to acquire a separate
license
would increase the acquisition price too much.
Abstract from the "V4RB COMMERCIAL LICENSE.pdf" of Valentina:
You agree that any application, product or device you create
including any
component of the Software, if it includes the ability to create,
modify, save
or store data, shall have only limited ability to modify fields
within a
database or its structure: any database application, product or
device shall
be limited by no less than 80% of its fields designated as containing
specific, unmodifiable data types. In addition, any application,
product, or
device you create will not have the ability to alter database schema.
do RB users really want these limitations in their RB products
(current and
future)?
If it's MacASP you're talking about, perhaps you should see if you can
work out a licensing arrangement of some sort with Paradigma.
Charles Yeomans
---
A searchable archive of this list is available at:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/search.php>
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:realbasic-nug-off at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subscribe to the digest:
<mailto:realbasic-nug-digest at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
.
|