realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Important socket question

To: REALbasic Network Users Group <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Important socket question
From: Richard Altenburg <realbasic at brainchild dot nl>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 09:30:17 +0200
On 31-03-2003 08:55, "Aaron Ballman" <aaron at realsoftware dot com> wrote:

> What I meant was: are you sure that at the low-level they ARE in fact
> working on the same port.  I believe 4.5 and before would let you try to
> bind to the same port (and let the underlying transport pick a random
> port for you).  I'm just curious if this is the case for your situation
> (since I can't test it out until tomorrow).

Sorry... I am not able to tell this, because I do not have InterArchy or
another program that enables me to track the traffic on my network. I will
have to wait until you can test it, and I am very curious to find out how
this is done... And would hate to loose it in RB 5.


---
A searchable archive of this list is available at:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/search.php>

Unsubscribe:
<mailto:realbasic-nug-off at lists dot realsoftware dot com>

Subscribe to the digest: 
<mailto:realbasic-nug-digest at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>