Re: Constructors for Modules

[Will Leshner <leshner at ljug dot com>]

Yes. I completely agree. I would also like to be able to enforce 
Singleton behavior. It *might* be possible to do this ourselves if we 
could indicate that a constructor was private (this would be a new 
feature, not the current "protected"). I think we might also need class 
methods. I believe if we had those two things we might be able to 
guarantee Singleton-ness ourselves. And they would be great features to 
have anyway.
Thomas Reed wrote:

> The one aspect of this that I *can* see wanting support for is 
> singletons.  It would be nice if there were some way of enforcing 
> singleton behavior for a class.  (ie, prevent more than one from being 
> created)


---
A searchable archive of this list is available at:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/search.php>

Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listmanager/>
.