I was pretty sure, actually, that that would be the case (that it would
be OS dependent). I'm using OS X 10.2.6. I haven't tried it anywhere
else.
I'm working on decoding an email subject that can have
quoted-printables in it, and it turns out to be a tricky little
problem. You can have different runs of quoted-printables with
different charsets defined, so I thought I'd try converting everything
to a standard encoding. But even UTF16 doesn't quite work the way I
want it to, so I think I'm going to have to break the string up into
parts, decode, then glue everything back together.
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 08:46 PM, Joseph J. Strout wrote:
Well, you can file a bug, but the conversions are provided by the OS.
It's possible (and apparently the case) that it supports conversion
of ISO-2022-JP to/from UTF-16 better than UTF-8. That's very weird,
though. What OS is this?
---
A searchable archive of this list is available at:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/search.php>
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listmanager/>
.
|