Good question. I don't know the intent of a documentation change.
However, I believe that self and me are both built-in functions and
keywords. They are functions because they provide a return (an instance
reference), and of course all function names are keywords.
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart Malin" <stuart at ossayu dot com>
To: "REALbasic Network Users Group"
<realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 3:46 PM
Subject: Self and Me: Function vs Keyword
I know this is an unnecessarily detailed query , but I like to
understand things well.
Prior to 5.5, Self and Me were described in the Lang Ref as
Functions.
In the 5.5 Lang Ref they are described as Keywords.
t
I know it likely makes no difference to the code we write, but if the
folks at
REALsoftware saw fit to change the descriptions, is there a reason
other
than accuracy about how Self and Me are actually implemented?
I presume that the compiler does its magic with these; that there are
no
built-in callable functions by these names. Is this right?
- - -
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
- - -
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>