Thanks for the reply.
I did find the problem (in my code) and can confirm that the SMTPSocket in
v5.5.1 does indeed correctly support SMTP authorization (simple username and
password).
--- Brad
----------
>From: Will Leshner <leshner at ljug dot com>
>To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
>Subject: Re: Which Version of RB Needed for Working SMTP Authorization?
>Date: Tue, May 11, 2004, 9:02 PM
>
>
> On May 11, 2004, at 5:49 PM, Brad Bennett wrote:
>
>>
>> Can someone else please confirm that SMTP Authorization does or does
>> not
>> work in RB v5.5.1? The bug report regarding this topic seems to
>> indicate
>> that this problem was fixed with v5.5a7.
>>
>
> I thought it was supposed to be fixed as well. And many servers do work
> fine. But technically, RB's SMTP client should be doing an EHLO, as you
> indicate. The best way to find out would be to sniff the packets and
> see. If I get motivated, I might try to do that, and if I do I'll let
> you know what I discover.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
> <http://support.realsoftware.com/listmanager/>
>
> Search the archives of this list here:
> <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|