| To: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: (one last try) (was Re: Events vs. Methods) (Brady Duga) |
| From: | "Theodore H.Smith" <delete at elfdata dot com> |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:37:33 +0100 |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <20040831132124 dot 6ECB741CD9B at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
I would have to subclass the Timer class, store a reference to the socket, store a reference to the Timer in the socket (oops, circular reference), and put code into the action event of the subclass that calls the socket telling it to send the data. No. You could hypothetically put it into the window code also. Events can work via classes and window code, so why not event-like methods also? No reason why not.
--
Theodore H. Smith - Software Developer.
http://www.elfdata.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Turning Integers into MemoryBlocks?, Thomas Reed |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Remote Debugging and VPC, Ian M.Jones |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Ask O'Reilly for a new edition to REALbasic The Definitive Guide, Dr.Scott Steinman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: (one last try) (was Re: Events vs. Methods) (Brady Duga), Brady Duga |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |