I accept problems, I accept bugs, but don't let me download B2 when you
have B7 already.
Knowing that B2 is no good.
I might not be an official beta tester, but why put me up with a beta
that is no good ?
Because of PR (you must release something when you're overtime) ? I
swear to you that this was no good PR !
On 31 Jul 2005, at 02:08, Bill Cavalieri wrote:
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 10:03 +1000, Keith Hutchison wrote:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
Yeah B2 isnt very good, Im testing B7 and can say that it runs a
hell of
alot better on Suse 9.3 than B2 did. Even compiles and runs pretty
reasonable. Be patient.
It's not about being patient, it's about valuing the beta testers
time.
If your testing B7, and it's so much better than B2, then why was B2
even
released to the public.
If your on B7, then B7 should be the release for the public beta
testers.
Because B2 was better than B1, and the alpha's before it. Would you
rather RS not make any public beta releases? Some of the beta releases
have been beta testers only, others have been made public.
It is a beta not release, expect problems.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Bien à vous,
Kind regards,
Yves Vindevogel
Implements
Mail: yves dot vindevogel at implements dot be - Mobile: +32 (478) 80 82 91
Kempische Steenweg 206 - 3500 Hasselt - Tel-Fax: +32 (11) 43 55 76
Web: http://www.implements.be
First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you.
Then you win.
Mahatma Ghandi.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|