realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RB Release Cycle Stability issues - A suggestion:-

To: "REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>" <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: RB Release Cycle Stability issues - A suggestion:-
From: Daniel Stenning <d0stenning at msn dot com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:10:30 +0000
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Thread-index: Acb8gPmVOG5rt2h0EduZawAKldQmeg==
Thread-topic: RB Release Cycle Stability issues - A suggestion:-
Ok. Done. Here it is:

http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=qnmukzxz


On 30/10/06 21:21, "Norman Palardy" <npalardy at great-white-software dot com>
wrote:

> 
> On Oct 30, 2006, at 2:07 PM, Daniel Stenning wrote:
> 
>> I don't see any reason why it need be a mess. People could still
>> opt to
>> install and use the entire release as done at the moment. It would
>> be up to
>> each RB user - once a new FINISHED release were made available, to
>> decide
>> for himself whether they use the entire release or configure their
>> RB setup
>> to use different versions.
>> 
>> Xcode allows one for example to decide which OSX version of the
>> frameworks
>> to use for a particular build.
> 
> While it sound reasonable I'd suspect there are technical impediments
> in the current product and it's architecture to doing this and that
> you should submit a feature request.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
> <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
> 
> Search the archives of this list here:
> <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
> 


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>