The issue of balkanizing the release components was brought up in a
nilobject.com post (well in a comment anyway).
Fortunately Jonathan has started writing again... Good stuff!
~joe
On 10/31/06 1:19 AM, "Ronald Vogelaar" <enter at rovosoft dot com> wrote:
> IMO RS should reorganize their company and start to make use of a QA
> department (Quality Assurance). No product that has not been thoroughly
> tested and okay'ed by QA gets released.
> Of course once you're commited to a quarterly release plan like they have,
> you're effectively shutting out any possibility of effective quality
> control, and it should be listed relatively high on the list of "100 ways to
> screw yourself and your customers".
> At the time I did voice my concern, and I'd much rather sit here having been
> proven wrong.
>
> Ronald Vogelaar
> http://www.rovosoft.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Stenning" <d0stenning at msn dot com>
> Subject: RB Release Cycle Stability issues - A suggestion:-
>
>
>> To help those developers whose applications often break on recompilation
>> with a new release I have a suggestion for RS:
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
> <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
>
> Search the archives of this list here:
> <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|