Re: Asserts & macros

To:	realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Subject:	Re: Asserts & macros
From:	"Lars Jensen" <larsjensen at gmail dot com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:06:17 -0800
Delivered-to:	listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to:	realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=f9yvSBMVWPBHoVVme1OXSa6Gd0Cx3/vIYwGcKYfu3MIUhXJCB2KQu/AGhyTzpz5+qGcwjTMKo7A9ExqgxCtKrxQj19p5wSr3vpDO8xZY+zXcdqP/94tbRr0Sy+4UldGDRsLP7YTj9amR900r3gq4cs/kyTY4hXhOwJhVldBTymk=

I would rather see inlining implemented in RB rather than new macro keywords
or macros with arguments - basically because inlining is more type safe.


I would rather see macros because they are more general and useful;
since any text can be an argument, they can handle inlining,
zero-footprint asserts with code output, types as arguments, etc.

lj
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Asserts & macros, Lars Jensen <= Re: Asserts & macros, Daniel Stenning

Previous by Date:	Re: Tab panels, Paul Rodman
Next by Date:	List selection, Youri
Previous by Thread:	Preemptive Thread for Universal Binary, Richard
Next by Thread:	Re: Asserts & macros, Daniel Stenning
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]