Please sign on:
When you run an app in RB and drop a file on an EditField or ListBox then it
shows immediately (which is the correct behaviour). However in the compiled
app a drop does not show until you make the window active (which gives no
feedback on the drop to the user). Using refresh.me in the control does not
work as a workaround.
http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=vkfnizxf
Best Regards
Markus
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
From Wed 29 Nov 2006 18:15:40 -0700
Return-Path: <realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
X-Original-To: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-To: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Received: by xmail.realsoftware.com (Postfix, from userid 1037)
id 41C5A1277254; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:16:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on
www.realsoftware.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME
autolearn=no version=3.1.1
Received: from lists.realsoftware.com (lists.realsoftware.com [209.198.132.125])
by xmail.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED83127724C;
Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:16:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists.realsoftware.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 454D216BF23F; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:15:50 -0600 (CST)
X-Original-To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Delivered-To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Received: from mail.verex.com (mail.verex.com [66.116.103.197])
by lists.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03B516BF231
for <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>;
Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:15:42 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [66.116.103.197] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.verex.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 200B56AA953
for <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>;
Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:15:40 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:15:40 -0700
From: joe at strout dot net
To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
In-Reply-To: <1824 dot 192 dot 168 dot 2 dot 145 dot 1164842597 dot squirrel at
ego>
X-Mailer: VerEx Email Gateway
Content-type: text/plain;
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20061130011540 dot 200B56AA953 at mail dot verex dot com>
Subject: Re: random seed generator?
X-BeenThere: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Errors-To: realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
On Nov 29, 2006, at 23:23 UTC, Fargo Holiday wrote:
> I imagine that the case is similar to PHP, where they moved to a self
> seeding model later, but kept the manual seed function to avoid
breaking
> older applications and to allow you room to experiment.
No, it was the way it is right from the start. Manual seeding is there
for those rare cases where you need a repeatable stream of pseudorandom
numbers. Scientists sometimes need this to make repeatable
simulations, for example.
Best,
- Joe
--
Joe Strout -- joe at strout dot net
Verified Express, LLC "Making the Internet a Better Place"
http://www.verex.com/
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|