If not illegal syntax, it would be nice to have the compiler throw a
warning (but not fail). I remember the first (and last) time I made
that error. It took me entirely too long to figure out what was going
on and why.
-Adam
On 5/16/07, Jim Dossey <jim dot dossey at gmail dot com> wrote:
> I wouldn't be at all surprised if some future version of RB made the Siamese
> Dims syntax illegal.
>
> On 5/16/07, Daniel Stenning <d0stenning at msn dot com> wrote:
> >
> > Sure but you don't get two seperate instances, you will get two
> > referrences
> > both pointing to the same instance.
> >
> > Its best always to instantiate explicitly seperately as in your second
> > example.
> >
> >
> > On 16/5/07 11:17, "Octave Julien" <ktawo at free dot fr> wrote:
> >
> > > If I understand correctly the Language reference's entries for DIM and
> > > NEW, it is possible to dim two new instances in the same statement.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
> <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
>
> Search the archives:
> <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
>
--
-Adam
dingostick.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|