| To: | "REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>" <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: For/next and array ubounds: optimising performance |
| From: | Daniel Stenning <d0stenning at msn dot com> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 May 2007 14:21:58 +0100 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| Thread-index: | AceYhVzmm7+SOgR4EdyC5AAKldQmegAAPuIq |
| Thread-topic: | For/next and array ubounds: optimising performance |
fyi: 38 seconds vs 43 seconds. Not a lot but using a local var is still consistently faster. On 17/5/07 14:14, "Daniel Stenning" <d0stenning at msn dot com> wrote: > > Now I just did some timings, and it seems that there is a slight ( not great > ) performance advantage with using a local variable. Regards, Dan _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Custom format (If that's your game Eric), Eric Richards |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Custom format (If that's your game Eric), Eric Richards |
| Previous by Thread: | For/next and array ubounds: optimising performance, Daniel Stenning |
| Next by Thread: | Re: For/next and array ubounds: optimising performance, James Sentman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |