| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: For/next and array ubounds: optimising performance |
| From: | Norman Palardy <npalardy at great-white-software dot com> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 May 2007 09:04:26 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <BAY107-DAV1220614F6DAB795C0116B093330 at phx dot gbl> |
On 17-May-07, at 7:21 AM, Daniel Stenning wrote: > fyi: 38 seconds vs 43 seconds. > > Not a lot but using a local var is still consistently faster. This is well known _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: For/next and array ubounds: optimising performance, Norman Palardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Custom format (If that's your game Eric), Norman Palardy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: For/next and array ubounds: optimising performance, Daniel Stenning |
| Next by Thread: | Re: For/next and array ubounds: optimising performance, Mathieu Langlois |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |