On 17-May-07, at 9:12 AM, Charles Yeomans wrote:
>> Except the size can change :)
>
> In which case you should not use a for-next loop, in general :)
Agreed ...
This is just one of those interesting side effects of re-evaluating
the limit each time vs doing it once
Careful choice of the right algorithm and the means to implement it
is almost always the biggest initial speed up
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
From Thu 17 May 2007 09:29:16 -0600
Return-Path: <realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
X-Original-To: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-To: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Received: by xmail.realsoftware.com (Postfix, from userid 1037)
id CCDE6267031A; Thu, 17 May 2007 08:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on
www.realsoftware.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=ham version=3.1.1
Received: from lists.realsoftware.com (m.realsoftware.com [66.116.103.65])
by xmail.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46DE2670310;
Thu, 17 May 2007 08:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from real-software-mini.local (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03352D9681;
Thu, 17 May 2007 10:29:29 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Delivered-To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Received: from mail.verex.com (mail.verex.com [66.116.103.197])
by lists.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798EA2D9652
for <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>;
Thu, 17 May 2007 10:29:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [66.116.103.197] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.verex.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C735275185F
for <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>;
Thu, 17 May 2007 09:29:16 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 09:29:16 -0600
Subject: Re: Grid Control: desired feature set
From: joe at strout dot net
To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
In-Reply-To: <A60BF467-96E1-4FD8-9EF6-40EEEE259409 at bradrhine dot com>
X-Mailer: VerEx Email Gateway
Message-Id: <20070517152916 dot C735275185F at mail dot verex dot com>
X-BeenThere: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Errors-To: realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
On May 17, 2007, at 15:06 UTC, Brad Rhine wrote:
> I think drag-reordering columns would be pretty nifty. Drag-
> reordering rows is almost a necessity.
Given that, it's amazing how many years I've lived without even wanting
it.
Cheers,
- Joe
--
Joe Strout -- joe at strout dot net
Strout Custom Solutions
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|