realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Intel vs. PPC math gotcha

To: "REALbasic NUG" <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Intel vs. PPC math gotcha
From: "Dennis Birch" <dennisbirch at gmail dot com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:18:43 -0700
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <fed2e2560705301533t6d8f66cdw86e8a3125dcf4128 at mail dot gmail dot com> <15F7B30A-E60E-4AA0-AF1E-F48054C42201 at great-white-software dot com> <5d7ca37e0705301827k7040dabvb66af85f6972cd70 at mail dot gmail dot com> <fed2e2560705310906i5b2ca1f1h2d02bc2603d5a75d at mail dot gmail dot com> <4C41BA69-F26B-4AF0-A004-94C1BE42DC54 at great-white-software dot com>
On 5/31/07, Norman Palardy <npalardy at great-white-software dot com> wrote:
>
> On 31-May-07, at 10:06 AM, Dennis Birch wrote:
> > But it appears to me that it's a case of RB number constants being
> > handled differently, which may be within the engineers' control.
>
> Since constants don't let us specify their exact type it could be
> simply how promoting a the single to a double behaves
>
> They derive their type from the contents and so you can't say this
> const is a double, this one a single, this one a Uint64

But you could expect RB to offer consistent behavior between platforms.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>