| To: | "REALbasic NUG" <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Intel vs. PPC math gotcha |
| From: | "Dennis Birch" <dennisbirch at gmail dot com> |
| Date: | Thu, 31 May 2007 09:18:43 -0700 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <fed2e2560705301533t6d8f66cdw86e8a3125dcf4128 at mail dot gmail dot com> <15F7B30A-E60E-4AA0-AF1E-F48054C42201 at great-white-software dot com> <5d7ca37e0705301827k7040dabvb66af85f6972cd70 at mail dot gmail dot com> <fed2e2560705310906i5b2ca1f1h2d02bc2603d5a75d at mail dot gmail dot com> <4C41BA69-F26B-4AF0-A004-94C1BE42DC54 at great-white-software dot com> |
On 5/31/07, Norman Palardy <npalardy at great-white-software dot com> wrote: > > On 31-May-07, at 10:06 AM, Dennis Birch wrote: > > But it appears to me that it's a case of RB number constants being > > handled differently, which may be within the engineers' control. > > Since constants don't let us specify their exact type it could be > simply how promoting a the single to a double behaves > > They derive their type from the contents and so you can't say this > const is a double, this one a single, this one a Uint64 But you could expect RB to offer consistent behavior between platforms. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Intel vs. PPC math gotcha, Norman Palardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Windows Dragging and Toolbars, Alexander Cohen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Intel vs. PPC math gotcha, Norman Palardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Intel vs. PPC math gotcha, Norman Palardy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |