| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Tenths of seconds in Date |
| From: | Arnaud Nicolet <arnaud at tribu dot ch> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:15:25 +0200 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <20070629162705 dot E749A7748CC at mail dot verex dot com> <89927903-EFCB-431B-BB26-A47CCB0320D3 at tribu dot ch> <DA46D58E-44B4-4036-9C51-BDE1C4E0B628 at declareSub dot com> <00D65B1C-1BE9-4FDF-9760-20E5EC382815 at tribu dot ch> <607D44B0-ED5C-4DAC-A4B3-B9148E2EAB45 at great-white-software dot com> |
Le 29 juin 07 à 20:36 Soir, Norman Palardy a écrit: > On 29-Jun-07, at 12:09 PM, Arnaud Nicolet wrote: > >> Thanks, but my question actually refers to "how" the tick value is >> provided (not the declare, but how the OS counts that; is it a >> specific process, etc). > > It used to be tied to the vertical retrace on CRT's > Basically an interrupt that the system serviced Thank you. It has changed since? _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Algorithm for generating memorable passwords?, Ian Piper |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Tenths of seconds in Date, Fargo Holiday |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Tenths of seconds in Date, Norman Palardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Tenths of seconds in Date, Fargo Holiday |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |