realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Linux Text Size

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Linux Text Size
From: Don Jungk <rb at flippingdades dot com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:10:05 -0500
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <200707291834 dot 46435 dot rb at flippingdades dot com> <EAD90DA1-07E3-4DBE-A1D5-32401F5F11F5 at austin-home dot com>
>
> > I call this the correct way because I worked as a typesetter and in
> > printing
> > plants for more than 30 years and type size has never been measured
> > from the
> > baseline.
>
> It's been measured from baseline for 23 years on computers, and when
> *I* worked with typesetting, type height was always measured baseline-
> to-ascender.

Well, not in the professional printing and publishing world it isn't. When 
PageMaker first came out in what, around 1985, they followed the printing 
convention of measuring the "slug", i.e. the distance from descender to 
ascender. Quark, which became the industry standard typesetting program by 
1991 has also followed this procedure. I can't find any program (except RB) 
that measures type sizes from the base line. Can you name one?

Don
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>