| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: High Performance Code (Was: Bitwise Shift operators) |
| From: | Norman Palardy <npalardy at great-white-software dot com> |
| Date: | Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:06:42 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive at realsoftware dot com |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <BAY107-DAV8132ACB18FF1E0678E2E693B20 at phx dot gbl> <981FFB08-71D3-487B-8A80-4352EE252BB4 at chaoticbox dot com> <2E23AD6D-B086-4475-8213-4C68AB804CFC at great-white-software dot com> <8458FDB7-710C-4350-8FF2-435B36560A6B at declareSub dot com> <88104531-FC2A-4B07-B6A9-BB80F7F17F73 at sqlabs dot net> |
On 29-Sep-07, at 11:46 AM, Marco Bambini wrote: > What is fast for you? > I mean, how many Microseconds it should take the FastSqrt function in > order to be "fast enough"? Since Dan, the original poster, seems to be using this sort of stuff for real time audio ... "fast enough" probably has to be "close to the speed of the routine if done in assembler" _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: High Performance Code (Was: Bitwise Shift operators), Charles Yeomans |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: High Performance Code (Was: Bitwise Shift operators), Daniel Stenning |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: High Performance Code (Was: Bitwise Shift operators), Marco Bambini |
| Next by Thread: | Re: High Performance Code (Was: Bitwise Shift operators), Daniel Stenning |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |