If you do attempt such venture, drop me a line, and perhaps we can come to
some arrangement by which you can use my C++ > RB converter code.
On 29/9/07 20:52, "Frank Condello" <developer at chaoticbox dot com> wrote:
> It would be very interesting to see how a "real" game would perform
> as a pure-RB port, and I have considered porting Quake in the past,
> but I simply don't have the time or patients to attempt it. Quake 3
> would probably be a better target however - if I label this
> "research" and get some serious funding maybe it'll happen (ya right!)
>
> Frank.
> <http://developer.chaoticbox.com/>
>
> On 29-Sep-07, at 3:17 PM, Daniel Stenning wrote:
>
>> Bearing in mind this and your previous mention of John Carmacks
>> work, I
>> notice that on your web site you have some role in maintaining the
>> old Quake
>> open source code base. Have you considered porting or attempted to
>> port it
>> to RB ?
>>
>> On 29/9/07 20:02, "Frank Condello" <developer at chaoticbox dot com> wrote:
>>
>>> In a real-world 3D app I have to
>>> normalize several thousand 3D vectors (among many other things) plus
>>> draw everything at (ideally) 60Hz.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dan
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
> <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
>
> Search the archives:
> <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
>
Cheers,
Dan
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|