On Jan 31, 2008, at 8:21 AM, David Grogono wrote:
> For a non-square RB3Dspace, the field of view is for the smaller of
> the two dimensions. That is, if an object exactly fills the view and
> you resize the space to make it wider, the object will still exactly
> fill the view top to bottom.
Thanks David. That does sound right.
> A couple of other things Bryan may want to keep in mind: FieldOfView
> is an integer, not a double and the minimum field of view is '5'.
> This are both limitations that I'd like to see changed, but for now
> it's something to keep in mind if you're doing calculations with
> FieldOfView.
In the meantime, it's worth noting that this can be worked around
pretty easily with Declares -- though only on platforms that support
Quesa declares (which regrettably is only the Mac these days).
Best,
- Joe
--
Joe Strout
Inspiring Applications, Inc.
http://www.InspiringApps.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|