realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OT] Why "Computer Science" - was Re: Packed Encoding

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: [OT] Why "Computer Science" - was Re: Packed Encoding
From: Bart Silverstrim <bsilver at chrononomicon dot com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:56:31 -0500
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <mailman dot 10010 dot 1204242186 dot 9216 dot realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <D6AA7003-3BDF-4951-8FAC-8F126E4CB0F7 at elfdata dot com>

Theodore H. Smith wrote:
>> On 28-Feb-08, at 3:34 PM, Theodore H. Smith wrote:
>>
>>> That makes no sense... To learn a "chemical" would take forever  
>>> too...
>>>
>>> It's simply because they wanted to make their field sound legitimate,
>>> because they felt insecure about their status as "real scientists".
>> No .. that's "social sciences" :)
> 
> Because? You happen to be a programmer and don't like the idea of  
> losing that word "science" from what you do?

Aye carumba.  Why is this even an issue?!

Look at Wikipedia.  It states:
Computer science (or computing science) is the study of the theoretical 
foundations of information and computation and their implementation and 
application in computer systems.[1][2][3] Computer science has many 
sub-fields; some emphasize the computation of specific results (such as 
computer graphics), while others relate to properties of computational 
problems (such as computational complexity theory). Still others focus 
on the challenges in implementing computations. For example, programming 
language theory studies approaches to describing computations, while 
computer programming applies specific programming languages to solve 
specific computational problems. A further subfield, human-computer 
interaction, focuses on the challenges in making computers and 
computations useful, usable and universally accessible to people.
************

Or, to paraphrase a quote I found, "A computer is to computer science 
what a telescope is to Astronomy."

The people that actually work on new implementations of algorithms, the 
people working on finding new ways of getting a computer in a car to 
drive itself, play chess beyond the skill of the best human, and 
understand what you're saying into your telephone so the nice people at 
the NSA don't have to pay people to do it, those people are scientists.

The article also seems to address your specific complaint further on, 
just after Mr. Feynman's famous quote from Lectures on Computation. 
Please, go take a look, and let's not just keep offering more arguments 
here or it's just going to get into a series of "HERE'S WHAT IT IS!" 
followed by, "You're just afraid to acknowledge that people who don't 
have your degree can do the same thing...", and eventually someone is 
going to need asbestos underwear and people will start stepping in to 
tell everyone else to shut up and someone will take their bat and ball 
and stomp home with their feelings hurt.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>