realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RealSQLDatabase/SQLite-based files: poor network performance. Is the

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: RealSQLDatabase/SQLite-based files: poor network performance. Is there a port issue?
From: Norman Palardy <npalardy at great-white-software dot com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:24:36 -0600
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com designates 66.116.103.65 as permitted sender) smtp dot mail=realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <77124270804281149i57918c46se45091d1618a06de at mail dot gmail dot com> <c867e59d0804281359nd7fec4dk97feed353c7258e0 at mail dot gmail dot com> <77124270804281739l5df618b9l8a5040ec4541ba36 at mail dot gmail dot com> <A15E7849-1681-4BA8-BA0D-25C6BFE55070 at austin-home dot com> <77124270804281919h78e96c61vb213d4eb4328eaa at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 28-Apr-08, at 8:19 PM, Peter K. Stys wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Glenn L. Austin <glenn at austin- 
> home.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> File copies are significantly faster because the file is read and
>> written sequentially.
>>
>> When you save a file across a network, the reads and writes are not
>> sequential, so it takes longer. 10 times longer wouldn't be that much
>> out of line.
>>
> but i'm talking about just reading a remote file into RAM on a local
> machine, no writes, just read the data across the network.  this  
> should be
> even faster than a file copy which entails reads and writes.

You'd think but I'd bet there are file locks involved still and that  
may impact things

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>