realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Differences in Graphic Formats

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Differences in Graphic Formats
From: Joe Strout <joe at inspiringapps dot com>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 17:20:23 -0600
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com designates 66.116.103.65 as permitted sender) smtp dot mail=realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <E68C62D6-9DDE-4735-988F-41A88A29B9EE at shaw dot ca> <2958CE02-F951-41E1-BB68-7480A205FD0D at declareSub dot com> <20080531223849 dot RRFN4495 dot aarprv04 dot charter dot net at CB56611-W dot chickensys dot com> <C76E4F46-98AB-4A3D-BF7E-52B3114E83AF at mac dot com>
On May 31, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Tom Benson wrote:

> I asked this same question a while back (Application Resources, to
> cache or not to cache?)
>
> In the end it was suggested that anything under about 100k should be
> cached if you plan on accessing it more than once.

Yes, but you're loading a picture from disk.  Garth is asking about a  
picture embedded in the project.

We can only guess as to what RB is doing in such a case, but my guess  
is that it's caching the picture itself, and there is no need for us  
to do so.

Best,
- Joe

--
Joe Strout
Inspiring Applications, Inc.
http://www.InspiringApps.com



_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>