On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:57 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:
On 12-Jun-08, at 12:39 PM, Stephen Tallent wrote:
The one thing I still am not keen on is you might as well write
SQL instead
of LINQ directly in your application
It doesn't seem to remove that necessity, just expose it in a
different
query language.
That Anders is a clever guy. There is a good bit more benefit to
it being
baked into the language than just changing queries from SQL to LINQ
for
aesthetics.
I'm sure there is
Just with what I've read so far I don't see the separation of UI,
business logic and storage in the same style as you get with EOF,
Cayenne, Hibernate etc
Maybe that is not presented very clearly and this is entirely
possible and I just need to read further
It's more like an abstraction layer. LINQ is supposed to be able to
work with a variety of data sources, including XML.
Charles Yeomans
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|