realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: OOP design question

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: OOP design question
From: Norman Palardy <npalardy@great-white-software.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:32:07 -0600
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
Delivered-to: listarchive@realsoftware.com
In-reply-to: <BAY107-DAV7FDA9B842A0345CAC2594937C0@phx.gbl>
References: <BAY107-DAV7FDA9B842A0345CAC2594937C0@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com

On 31-Jul-08, at 7:26 AM, Daniel Stenning wrote:

You might also want to consider the MBS pre-emptive MT classes if you need the power that this gives you, but writing code for pre-emptive threads is
fraught with dangers so beware :)

Just so people are aware
RB is not thread safe so using preemptive threads that call back into RB is just asking for problems at some point.
MBS cannot change this
This discussion was had earlier this year <http:// support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/realbasic-nug/2008-01/ msg01481.html>

A system of main & helper apps would not have the same requirements and could be distributed across machines depending on how you have your inter application communications set up


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>