realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: OOP design question

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: OOP design question
From: Norman Palardy <npalardy@great-white-software.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:39:08 -0600
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
Delivered-to: listarchive@realsoftware.com
In-reply-to: <C671CEC6-1EE3-4B05-8FAA-A2251F33537B@edlr.fr>
References: <45482FD9-86C2-47DA-B62D-25BA4C9B3C96@edlr.fr> <BAY107-DAV7FDA9B842A0345CAC2594937C0@phx.gbl> <eb8fc1930807310740t454796aetf3ce4ac2ff4bb7b2@mail.gmail.com> <5CB127CA-0274-4854-8436-E7C6A74F2287@great-white-software.com> <C671CEC6-1EE3-4B05-8FAA-A2251F33537B@edlr.fr>
Reply-to: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com

On 31-Jul-08, at 9:49 AM, Eric de La Rochette wrote:


Le 31 juil. 08 à 17:00, Norman Palardy a écrit :

Spin up one helper per frame and make as many as you want

Aaah ! Interesting way to do it. But it would such a mess to get back the pictures in the proper order, wouldn't it ?

Why ?
send over a frame reference (id frame #) and the returned data can include that
You should be able to assemble them in the right order from that


You should be able to use 100% of every CPU doing this :)

Only 100%... Not enough for me ! We always need 5000% of the CPU when it comes to long processes. ;P


100% per cpu
Got 8 cpus - 800%
Got 10 machines with 8 cpus ?
The advantage to splitting it this way is you could distribute the helper apps across many machines







_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>