realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: When is a mac not a Mac?

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: When is a mac not a Mac?
From: Joe Huber <joehuber@talasoft.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:39:06 -0700
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
Delivered-to: listarchive@realsoftware.com
In-reply-to: <C4DF4F29.4FF65%markus_winter@online.de>
References: <C4DF4F29.4FF65%markus_winter@online.de>
Reply-to: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
At 7:25 PM +0200 8/30/08, Markus Winter wrote:
Microsoft used their licensing agreement to try and prevent people from
selling on their software (like Office or Windows) but that was declared as
illegal (at least here in Europe) - the manufacturer cannot restrict how the
user uses the software.

I think Apple will fall foul of the same.

You don't own the software. You bought a license to use the software on an Apple-labeled Macintosh.

If someone buys an RB upgrade, do you think they should be able to use it if they didn't previously purchase a full RB license?

In Apple's case, the full OSX license is only sold with their systems. It's completely inappropriate (and illegal) to use the OSX upgrade software on a system that doesn't have a basic Macintosh license to begin with.

Regards,
Joe Huber

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>