realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: When is a mac not a Mac?

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: When is a mac not a Mac?
From: Joe Huber <joehuber@talasoft.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:54:10 -0700
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
Delivered-to: listarchive@realsoftware.com
Reply-to: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
At 8:35 PM +0200 8/30/08, Richard Altenburg (Brainchild) wrote:
I am so glad I only use Apple labeled computers that I originally bought new myself. I have no licensing issues whatsoever, but to be honest I was not aware of the software license being an update only. It does not hurt me in anyway then, and I am 100 % sure that I will never use or support a hacked install of Mac OS X, but still it feels strange to pay for an OS and not have a full license for it.

Hi Richard

Yes, Apple has made it very convenient for legal users and we don't even notice any of these licensing issues, unlike the Microsoft users who have to go through activation hell. But the licensing issues are much the same in any case. Both MS and Apple sell OS upgrades with roughly the same terms. And MS sells a full install license for more money, where as Apple only provides their full license with a new Mac. In effect the Mac itself is Apple's activation key. :-)

Best regards,
Joe Huber

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>