realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Can't go back to 2007r3 after installing 2008r4

To: "REALbasic NUG" <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Can't go back to 2007r3 after installing 2008r4
From: "Carlos M" <rblists@rbtips.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:42:25 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Delivered-to: listarchive@realsoftware.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=lICBGUTHJ2DNERPAWO4ppZVmXQ0ikj+5T+XEy83Jm9E=; b=kRLDCbaXu0Xn8YccifMZEx1NYfL0R394ZQdhbT7ED22ZFvojBvL1Ryrx4rUwwPUcHL S9VWw6sJORMjRnS7haIy8Ez0x/oLuRj7esTpt7+69KPTwi6UWy2BzHIqO4U0uda1SX/6 IYOVxaWCnLGJtRAQKSHd497NagbQBaXpL9cMk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=maAEK64BaphrVMCemboMw32nfW+vdfZhKzluqMw5fNqcRU+1aaUJk13lzCfYqQqTeN 0uhEWKvP1vy1Qxet+E2rLfmY+jqYUIGIcbp4XDFziwBno0Dwg0C2AXyXwljn4jb/Qaxg 0i0WCPAqnp7p98WENRwTwgB08Bobeq7fAYZyk=
In-reply-to: <98DBD2D4-DD80-4FEA-9E0B-E2A23877F542@great-white-software.com>
References: <45a1b53e0809290758g24c76f50ya76061b8618ce5d1@mail.gmail.com> <20080929161114.RHRX3342.aarprv06.charter.net@CB56611-W.chickensys.com> <98DBD2D4-DD80-4FEA-9E0B-E2A23877F542@great-white-software.com>
Reply-to: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:
>
> On 29-Sep-08, at 10:04 AM, Rubber Chicken Software Co. wrote:
>> The only issue involved here is shared files.
>
> This has nothing to do with shared files
> It is the registry entries that cause the problem
> Prior versions wrote some entries to the registry but not as designed
> Newer versions have changed this to be how it had been designed
> The older versions expect those incorrect entries while the newer version
> expects the updated ones

Norman,
So, why didn't RS just stored the new (or corrected) registry keys
into a new folder starting with 2008r4 and left the "old" registry
keys in place for the previous versions? This wouldn't cause any
incompatibilities... and this is a solution that is very common to use
in Windows for these cases.

I'm really perplexed why RS didn't use such solution and preferred to
overwrite the registry keys *knowing* that this would cause
incompatibilities that wouldn't allow a previous version to run
simultaneously with 2008r4.

Carlos

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>