realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RapidRelease model - verdict after a few years?

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: RapidRelease model - verdict after a few years?
From: Eric de La Rochette <rblists@edlr.fr>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:37:32 +0000
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
Delivered-to: listarchive@realsoftware.com
In-reply-to: <45a1b53e0810290925m3b180df5r5f4e25c70c2c4024@mail.gmail.com>
References: <45a1b53e0810290925m3b180df5r5f4e25c70c2c4024@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com

Le 29 oct. 08 à 16:25, Wade Maxfield a écrit :

It is in their best interests to keep putting out a buggy product.
However, it is also not in their best interests to put out a product with
too many bugs.

Why? If they fix all of the bugs, no one will subscribe to the ongoing update program. If their bugs are too bad, people will give up on them.

Wade, you should read this:

<http://www.murphys-laws.com/murphy/murphy-computer.html>

Very interesting... and funny !

Eric.



_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>