Re: Interfaces and Computed Properties

[Norman Palardy <npalardy@great-white-software.com>]

On 26-Nov-08, at 4:24 PM, Thom McGrath wrote:

> It should be possible to return super.visible instead. It works in  
> many other places, don't see why it wouldn't work here.
super.X doesn't work with properties :)

you have to use a different mechanism to get access to your  
superclass' properties
introspection might work for this 

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>