realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Interfaces and Computed Properties

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Interfaces and Computed Properties
From: Karen <keatk@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:36:12 -0500
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
Delivered-to: listarchive@realsoftware.com
In-reply-to: <007DA3B0-FAE4-4E85-81E4-A0122C860DC1@great-white-software.com>
References: <4F4D1ADF-52CE-4EBA-9346-9BE37992CCDD@xochi.com> <1ED2BB86-1E43-4A4C-8245-F8D587E28BC2@great-white-software.com> <BFB05065-1FC3-4400-A27F-1448615FFD11@xochi.com> <33cbfa100811261510l7803122fu2592dd1d7f03848b@mail.gmail.com> <421C4E27-0784-4D03-B28D-EB52A783BADE@great-white-software.com> <33cbfa100811261628h68d4a3c2xd11a3ca8d3c9881e@mail.gmail.com> <007DA3B0-FAE4-4E85-81E4-A0122C860DC1@great-white-software.com>
Reply-to: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com

On Nov 26, 2008, at 7:59 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:

pure abstract classes are "interfaces" in C++ .. and you dont put properties in them either :)

REALBasic is not C++

Besides religion, what would be the downside to being able to specify properties that have to exist (without specifying if they are computed or not). I've never understood what would be so bad about that... and it sure could make life easier sometimes!

- Karen

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>