| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Interfaces and Computed Properties |
| From: | Charles Yeomans <charles@declareSub.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:20:12 -0500 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive@realsoftware.com |
| In-reply-to: | <C55895A0.23AA4%tt@tempel.org> |
| References: | <C55895A0.23AA4%tt@tempel.org> |
| Reply-to: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com> |
| Sender: | realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com |
On Nov 30, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Thomas Tempelmann wrote: On 30.11.2008 18:25 Uhr, "Charles Yeomans" <charles@declareSub.com> wrote:I don't see why this would be a good idea.What are you referring two, exactly? Adding "properties" to class interfaces. Computed properties provide a way to add more or less the same thing to a class, and prevent them from being overridden.Isn't that what I'm saying? The feature request is about this limitation andhow to remove it. I don't consider this a limitation; I consider it a feature. Charles Yeomans _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Interfaces and Computed Properties, Thomas Tempelmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Interfaces and Computed Properties, lists@mgreg.com |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Interfaces and Computed Properties, Thomas Tempelmann |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Interfaces and Computed Properties, Thomas Tempelmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |