realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Interfaces and Computed Properties

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Interfaces and Computed Properties
From: Charles Yeomans <charles@declareSub.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:20:51 -0500
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
Delivered-to: listarchive@realsoftware.com
In-reply-to: <C558A40B.23AAF%tt@tempel.org>
References: <C558A40B.23AAF%tt@tempel.org>
Reply-to: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com

On Nov 30, 2008, at 2:11 PM, Thomas Tempelmann wrote:

On 30.11.2008 19:20 Uhr, "Charles Yeomans" <charles@declareSub.com> wrote:

I don't see why this would be a good idea.

What are you referring two, exactly?

Adding "properties" to class interfaces.

Ah, but you replied to me, and I was talking about something different. You
actually meant to reply to Michael Diehr's suggestion, right?

I did.

Since it's unlikely that RS is going to extend class interfaces, don't you think that our time might be better spent writing a replacement for the FolderItem class?

Charles Yeomans

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>