realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Tips Shrinking App Size

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Tips Shrinking App Size
From: Michael Diehr <md03@xochi.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:24:14 -0800
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
Delivered-to: listarchive@realsoftware.com
In-reply-to: <35739C2F-BE94-4D61-917E-FAE5827B92BB@xochi.com>
References: <35739C2F-BE94-4D61-917E-FAE5827B92BB@xochi.com>
Reply-to: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
More info -- checking out the Win32 build sizes, I notice something odd -- the DLL sizes are nearly 2x the size of the equivalent Mac .dylib.

For example:
 560KB RBXML.rbx_0.dylib (Mac Intel)
1100KB XML.dll (Win32 x86)

Since both libs contain x86 code, I'd expect them to be roughly the same size. The 2x size increase for Win32 dlls seems odd -- could this be a bug in the way the DLLs are built?


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>