| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: COM support |
| From: | Adam Shirey <adam.shirey@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:37:29 -0600 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive@realsoftware.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=npIJDVOSmuqWwsmji/zNBAAwyE6vjfShqreB5faIwZw=; b=ZSnpGz453sDEILiZLS5l9xliRriXQUW3FJMLJo/ks9gr5UR+8NdHKFQqITB2WUVY+l 21nxLFeZcUY189lHENsndpZXJ0s9ZhW5PBsvSWcERnOtjz3fvv8mD0AFSbELYYCcLnfU v2n6DMKf7oULtIURunSsQe9JDaNRvBJJUW4WI= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KF4JjeRvRCsuRirAiR+zw+JAymGFA6A60VuqKk/vZSPGzL+j8ejCdsxp9IPcZ2XNTT TQmK3uc8v/Ko64hYt/diyjwFbHyejPIZlyEB+rMeIEoyivvWsvZK/E9ptrxG94h12cGi 7wkqR5wz0wF6X9tQ77anNS9ByESO+pT18VoDc= |
| In-reply-to: | <E79EE5A0-0E2A-4EF9-A895-AB0B0DB5276B@great-white-software.com> |
| References: | <31becf620902261052y5659605bhbbe2f95720dded5@mail.gmail.com> <E79EE5A0-0E2A-4EF9-A895-AB0B0DB5276B@great-white-software.com> |
| Reply-to: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com> |
| Sender: | realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com |
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Norman Palardy <npalardy@great-white-software.com> wrote: > >> I think adding COM support would be a pretty quick and definitely big win >> for REALbasic. > > > I can assure you it's not a "pretty quick" thing to add full COM/ActiveX > support "Pretty quick" is a relative term, and I certainly don't equate it to "trivial". However, I've discussed it with Aaron (who has several postings on his website regarding COM and did much of the research while he was at Real), and he asserts it's a reasonably quick fix -- though it takes the will to implement it. -- -Adam dingostick.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Servers, Ports and scratching me head, Fabian Rueger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Slow Listboxes, Stan Busk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: COM support, Norman Palardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: COM support, Charles Yeomans |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |