| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TCP packet - are separate packets collected into one? |
| From: | Eric dLR <rblists@edlr.fr> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:20:59 +0000 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive@realsoftware.com |
| In-reply-to: | <49A71007.4030406@bellsouth.net> |
| References: | <89fe53800902261201u4d7703d7s5a7f9edeab9bad45@mail.gmail.com> <49A70E35.1090504@bellsouth.net> <49A71007.4030406@bellsouth.net> |
| Reply-to: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com> |
| Sender: | realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com |
Le 26 févr. 09 à 21:56, Brian Rathbone a écrit : You need to account for all eventualities. Don't forget the case where data are dropped or altered. I always include a checksum mechanism... just in case. Eric. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TCP packet - are separate packets collected into one?, Brian Rathbone |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Slow Listboxes, Joe Strout |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TCP packet - are separate packets collected into one?, Joe Strout |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TCP packet - are separate packets collected into one?, James Sentman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |