| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: FolderItem.delete Oddities? |
| From: | Thomas Tempelmann <tempelmann@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:53:47 +0200 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | listarchive@realsoftware.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TmrFJX3fMawPKtUdccBdSBaAiQmAfWKuIjgIL+3jA00=; b=nu0bmCmRIJJLZviobXvd/dripIQR3ER+FMYmYAuFfmKJldg5UJPvEixu9PjK93u3KO AxXmOhnnefoDnbE0Z4NoWdbAjQ1A+HLKmbJe8RG37hzelgLjmoug5+isjlvBl/KnA8rW ib91IrX+vZYA/RHkCyfOr/CvmxFfai4NPdSrA= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RJ+j0QAu8g0AXFEvBoix9/p3Eh68yWv742KW/7QrxlBWQvaQdguZFq4cvufH7B2TS5 LK8k6zoo4mDMama1LiQIs2qHaRgOcfcbcKDKPVPgmlCnsK5dQNdiJzJaSeoB3HQ5mdAV gtMyAq6ZK62F54r2AYATjjir4rw9a13LSPyg8= |
| In-reply-to: | <2DA6A6CD-2049-437C-B9DC-F95144365F35@mac.com> |
| References: | <382799.72156.qm@web65614.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <A0B9E68F-F447-4291-9727-E72D8648E1B4@online.de> <58031FB4-BB70-45EC-B698-FBB7998DC783@mac.com> <E7631244-FE97-4299-BC4A-79EDF81E8393@online.de> <89fe53800903311240y1999380dt2fbfe60ce44cc408@mail.gmail.com> <2DA6A6CD-2049-437C-B9DC-F95144365F35@mac.com> |
| Reply-to: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com> |
| Sender: | realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com |
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 21:49, Arnaud Nicolet <anic297@mac.com> wrote: > > Well, you have explained it well, but I'm not happy with this new way (it's > simply preventing to make nicer apps for Mac OS X because other OSes are too > fool to adopt more flexible APIs). Don't you get it? OS X is now the same way. None of the supported platforms are now efficient with the way the (old) RB framework allowed direct indexing. In fact, it's the FolderItem.Item() function that should get deprecated in favor of a Items() function that returns an array of all items in a dir. Or one that returns an FolderItemIterator object that you can then call to get each item, one by one (using a Next() call) -- Thomas Tempelmann, http://www.tempel.org/ _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: FolderItem.delete Oddities?, Arnaud Nicolet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: FolderItem.delete Oddities?, Arnaud Nicolet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: FolderItem.delete Oddities?, Arnaud Nicolet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FolderItem.delete Oddities?, Arnaud Nicolet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |