realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Scope/Protection Question

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Scope/Protection Question
From: Karen <keatk@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 22:56:00 -0400
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
Delivered-to: listarchive@realsoftware.com
In-reply-to: <5EAEA20D-BC8B-490D-8384-C965258AECF7@satx.rr.com>
References: <345AFE42-338C-4588-9F76-7560C88B8609@verizon.net> <671647DA-EC14-41EB-A175-5289BBC5E0E3@satx.rr.com> <4A2197C1.1030809@inspiringapps.com> <5EAEA20D-BC8B-490D-8384-C965258AECF7@satx.rr.com>
Reply-to: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com

On May 30, 2009, at 8:21 PM, William Squires wrote:

That is, in the code in Class2, you can refer to Property1 without an accessor, but you'll be referring to the value of Property1 associated with the instance of Class2 that you created with New. A different instance of Class2 cannot access the Property1 in the first instance without an accessor!!

And this isn't even true, since you can trivially access the other object's Property1 simply by typecasting it to a Class1.

This should be a bug! :) As should:


I think you are getting private and protected mixed up.

- karen

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>