On May 31, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:
On 31-May-09, at 12:44 PM, Michael Diehr wrote:
On May 31, 2009, at 8:17 AM, Norman Palardy wrote:
On 30-May-09, at 4:19 PM, Michael Diehr wrote:
I haven't tried it but I suspect
if v1.operator_compare(v2) ......
would do
It doesn't work for me...
Hmmm....
Having to cast would defeat what I think you're after but I think
I can see why it's necessary
I'll have to do some checking to see if what I'm thinking is the
reason
Thanks norman! -- let me know if you want me to submit a feature
request / bug report?
Submit a bug report
if v1 <> v2
and
if v1.objectValue <> v2.objectValue
are SUPPOSED to be using the defined operator compares methods but
aren't
That's a bug
I don't see how the latter can be. The return type of
Variant.ObjectValue is Object, so this is no different than
dim obj1 as Object = new Class1
dim obj2 as Object = new Class1
if obj1 <> obj2
a situation known not to use Operator_Convert because of the refusal
of RS to define an Object class.
Charles Yeomans
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|