realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: User Editable Reports

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: User Editable Reports
From: Greg O'Lone <rbnuglist@stretchedout.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:24:28 -0400
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 74.124.194.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com) smtp.mail=realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
Delivered-to: listarchive@realsoftware.com
In-reply-to: <3F5FADCA-42FB-4348-8054-E9AB98AAB4A2@oofile.com.au>
References: <EB4F4704-34E3-4B02-B0EA-84465C8F4274@stretchedout.com> <3F5FADCA-42FB-4348-8054-E9AB98AAB4A2@oofile.com.au>
Reply-to: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug@lists.realsoftware.com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces@lists.realsoftware.com
On Jul 31, 2009, at 1:02 pm, Andy Dent wrote:


On 07/31/2009, at 9:01 PM, Greg O'Lone wrote:

So I'm in the final stages of wrapping up a project for a customer and they have started asking why they can't edit/create their own reports.

I put the visual report editor for rbrw on hold when RS announced their own engine.

The fact that a beta version of the visual editor has been shipped in 2009r3 suggests it is close but it could also just sit there for months without being worked on without negatively affecting the rest of the IDE. I suspect that RS are going to want it shipped as a major feature soon but you've got to wonder how work there is prioritised compared to Cocoa, which is now acknowledged as being late.

Hmm, maybe I should resume work on my editor!

Andy,

I looked at the RB editor and what I saw was a way for the Developer to create reports, but not for an end user to create their own. This is one of the reasons I'm asking.

Greg

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>